News and Views

News

Voices

Arts

Life and Work

Milestones

Submit your news

Submit commentary

Support us

Become a member

Advertising

Print advertising

Web advertising

About us

Contact us

The Commons
Voices / Viewpoint

Considering the cycle of nuclear fuel

The VY debate is not just about electricity, job, taxes, or the local economy. It's also about how nuclear fuel pollutes communities

BILL PEARSON, a familiar antinuclear voice in the Vermont Yankee debate, serves as clerk and secretary of the New England Coalition.

Originally published in The Commons issue #124 (Wednesday, October 26, 2011).


Previous page


What do you think? Leave us a comment

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.

Comments (2)

Topic: COMM-0124.opin.view.pearson
Facebookdel.icio.usStumbleUponDiggGoogle+Twitter
Gravatar
Full StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty Star
Howard Shaffer (Enfield Nh, US) says...
Mr Pearson is a good writer and strings words together to make a compelling case. His words contain many factual errors and expose that he is acting out of fear rather than reason.After 18 months VY fuel is not too radioactive, it is used to the point of its design where it must be replaced. Boiling Water Reactor fuel can be designed for higher power and longer cycles. Dresden 2&3 reactors operate on a two year cycle and are over 900 MWe.Low enriched reactor fuel can not be made in to ... Read More
28th October 2011 5:48pm
Gravatar
Full StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty Star
John Barton (Brattleboro, US) says...
Wow, biased much?You seem to have forgotten that nuclear power, as dangerous as you make it seem, is one of the SAFEST power sources we have.Coal, oil, natural gas, these are all 100's of times more dangerous than nuclear power. They kill people every day. Not just when there's a problem. During normal operation, every day, the main power source of our country kills people at rates far worse than Chernobyl.The alternatives, solar, wind, hydro, are often quite bad for the environment. ... Read More
26th October 2011 3:01pm
Page 1 of 1

Add Comment

* Required information
(will not be published)
What is the opposite word of small?
 
Enter answer:
 
Notify me of new comments via email.
 
Remember my form details on this computer.
 
I have read and understand the privacy policy. *