News and Views

News

Voices

Arts

Life and Work

Milestones

Submit your news

Submit commentary

Support us

Become a member

Advertising

Print advertising

Web advertising

About us

Contact us

Privacy Policy

The Commons
Photo 1

Mike Faher/The Commons and VTDigger

Lyle Holiday, Windham Southeast Supervisory Union superintendent, looks over a four-town school merger plan at an Aug. 24 meeting in Brattleboro.

News

Windham Southeast merger plan moves ahead

With Vernon out, a vote is set for Nov. 7 on four-town proposal

Originally published in The Commons issue #423 (Wednesday, August 30, 2017).



BRATTLEBORO—Voters finally may get a chance to consider a four-town school district merger in Windham Southeast Supervisory Union.

The union’s Act 46 Study Committee has approved a proposal for combining districts in Brattleboro, Dummerston, Guilford, and Putney into one new district governed by one board. If the state Board of Education also OK’s the plan, the matter will go to voters in those four towns on Nov. 7

The outcome is far from certain, as Windham Southeast’s merger talks have been protracted and difficult. But officials are planning a series of community meetings and other outreach efforts in advance of the vote.

“We’ve been working on it for a while, and I think we all feel good about it,” said Alice Laughlin, the study committee’s chairwoman. “I think we’re looking forward to having people really understand why the merger is worthy of their consideration.”

Laughlin and Windham Southeast administrators have presided over a process that began in fall 2015, not long after the state Legislature’s approval of Act 46.

The statute pushes for creation of larger, consolidated school districts statewide in an effort to reduce costs and improve educational opportunities. But Windham Southeast has had a hard time coming up with a plan that satisfies the goals of Act 46 and the desires of local residents.

Varying concerns

Some of the opposition has been ideological: There is concern that school mergers won’t be beneficial, and some don’t like the idea of giving up each town’s direct control over school properties and education budgets.

There also has been structural strife. Vernon officials pulled out of Windham Southeast’s merger talks due to a desire to preserve their school-choice setup, and Vernon residents eventually voted to leave the regional school union so that the town can pursue its own Act 46 plan.

Earlier this year, the study committee put out a public call for the state’s assistance in resolving Act 46 issues. State experts responded with detailed information about the law but declined to tell the committee which options to pursue.

All of that led to an Aug. 24 meeting in Brattleboro, where the study committee put the finishing touches on a proposal to create the “Windham Southeast Unified District.”

The plan doesn’t call for immediate closure of any schools. But it does away with each town’s individual school board in favor of a new, nine-member board that would oversee one budget.

A unified district, the study committee’s report says, “will result in one mission and vision benefitting all our students.”

Merger proponents say the larger district would allow more staff flexibility as well as the ability to expand educational, after-school, and summer programs.

“Each school has a unique culture,” the study committee’s report says. “The expectation would be to maintain that culture and have the opportunity for additional programming.”

There also are financial motivations to form a consolidated district.

In addition to tax incentives offered by the state to merging districts, proponents also say the merger will promote “more efficient financial programming and delivery of financial services.” Initial savings are estimated at more than $100,000 and could grow, officials say.

’Pure speculation’

But some aren’t buying it. Dummerston resident Jody Normandeau, a critic of the merger process, told committee members that the local Act 46 plan is “not palatable.”

Normandeau is concerned, for instance, about losing her town’s vote on a school budget. In the combined district, the towns would vote collectively on a budget via Australian ballot.

She also objects to giving up Dummerston’s school board, though the merger plan calls for creation of “school-based leadership councils” to advise the four-town board.

Sacrificing local control, Normandeau argued, would bring debatable gains. Claims of financial savings and educational improvement are “pure speculation,” she said.

“We don’t know. We won’t know until we get into it,” Normandeau told the committee. “And once we get into it, we can’t get out.”

Nevertheless, the eight study committee members who were present voted unanimously to send the merger plan to the state. They expect the Board of Education to review the documents at a meeting in September, though a specific date hasn’t yet been announced for that session.

If the state board approves Windham Southeast’s plan, the merger process would kick into high gear.

In addition to voting on the merger Nov. 7, residents in the four towns also would be electing members of the new, combined school board. Anyone interested in running for those positions will be able to pick up petitions starting Sept. 21, but they have to be returned by Oct. 2.

“It’s a very short turnaround,” said Lyle Holiday, Windham Southeast superintendent.

The study committee also has scheduled informational meetings in each of the affected towns: Oct. 30 in Dummerston, Nov. 1 in Brattleboro, Nov. 2 in Putney, and Nov. 6 in Guilford. Each meeting will start at 6 p.m. and will be held at the town’s school, though the location for the Brattleboro meeting hasn’t yet been determined.

Each town’s vote has been deemed “necessary” to the merger plan. That means that if one town votes against it, the merger can’t happen.

That would initiate a scramble to come up with a new Act 46 plan to meet state deadlines. Jill Stahl Tyler, an Act 46 Study Committee member who chairs the Brattleboro Town School Board, said her board already has decided to look into “any other alternative [merger] structures that anyone else is thinking of.”

That’s not a lack of confidence in the current plan, she said. Rather, it’s a matter of “being prudent in case it doesn’t go through.”

What do you think? Leave us a comment

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.