Not-for-Profit, Award-Winning Community News and Views for Windham County, Vermont • Since 2006
Photo 1

Randolph T. Holhut/The Commons

What the well-read library director is wearing this fall: Starr LaTronica shows off her literary footwear.

News

50 years of bringing the town together

Memories of the creation of today’s Brooks Library, from the man who oversaw its construction in 1967

BRATTLEBORO—Current Brattleboro Town Manager Peter Elwell was 5 years old when the town tore down the original Brooks Memorial Library on Main Street in 1967.

“My memories weren’t very vivid,” he said.

But he does remember the new library being built and that it opened on Sept. 23, 1967, five days before his father’s 40th birthday.

Corwin “Corky” Elwell was the Town Manager then. Five days from his 90th birthday, the elder Elwell shared the story about how the new Brooks Memorial Library was built during its 50th anniversary anniversary celebration.

The Victorian-era library, built in 1887 with funds from successful Brattleboro entrepreneur George J. Brooks, was showing its age by the 1960s.

It sat between the Post Office and the Masonic Hall on Main Street, and the federal government coveted the land the library sat on for a parking lot and to expand the busy Brattleboro Post Office.

“They made the town an offer we could not refuse — $70,000 for the site,” Corwin said.

There was little outcry over the plan to demolish the library. Corwin Elwell said the Library Trustees were completely autonomous then, and their only interaction with town government was the article they put on the town meeting warrant each year seeking funds to supplement their operating budget.

“The [Selectboard] didn’t make any of the decisions,” Elwell said. “We just paid the bills.”

But the trustees knew what they wanted. Elwell said they had prepared a report in 1955 anticipating the day when a new library needed to be built. That report had two primary recommendations. The new library needed to be on Main Street, and it must have open space so it is welcoming to its patrons.

It cost $560,000 — almost $4.2 million in today’s dollars — to build the new library. A house that once stood at the foot of the hill where Brattleboro High School — today’s Municipal Center — is was bought and demolished.

Frederick J. Mahaffey of Hartford, Conn., was chosen by the Library Trustees as the architect for the new library, and he designed what was then the most modern looking building on Main Street, with its large glass windows facing the street and an airy, high-ceilinged main reading room.

The patrons certainly liked the new building. According to former Library Director Jerry Carbone, Brooks Library saw a 20 percent increase in circulated materials in its first year.

But Carbone said the loss of the old library “left some scars in the community.” He attributes the success of efforts to save the Brooks House and Union Station from demolition in the late 1960s and early 1970s to the realization of what was lost when the old Brooks Library was torn down.

After 50 years, the current Brooks Memorial Library is a fixture on Brattleboro’s Main Street, a space that current Library Director Starr LaTronica calls ”Brattleboro’s living room.”

At every hour of the day, something is happening there. As the special guest of the birthday celebration, author and advice columnist Amy Dickinson, said in her remarks, “Every visit to a library is an opportunity to make connections.”

And the most important connection of all, she said, is the human connection shared by everyone who uses public libraries.

That connection has been maintained, as Corky Elwell said earlier in the day, “by the effort and support that the people of Brattleboro have given to its library services.”

As someone who benefited from that support while growing up in Brattleboro, Peter Elwell called Brooks Library “a really, really important space in our community ... it is not just a place for knowledge and experience, it is a place to come together.”

What do you think? Leave us a comment

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.

Add Comment

* Required information
1000
What is the opposite word of weak?
Captcha Image
Powered by Commentics

Comments (12)

Sort By
Topic: Page One
5/5 (2)
1 2 3 > Last
Gravatar
New
Tamara Stenn
Gravatar
1
0
0
Aug 2018
Tamara Stenn (Brattleboro, Vermont, US) says...

Thanks for writing this Elayne. I was thinking the same thing myself. The silence we received from the hospital is quite deafening. Unfortunately we\'ve had to continue working with the hospital as other (minor) heath issues come up.

Gravatar
New
Judith Skillman
Gravatar
1
0
0
Aug 2018
Judith Skillman (Newcastle, US) says...

Excellent and informative writing about the media and about the state of our nation. We must support the press speak truth to power, now more than ever before.

Gravatar
Regular
Ruby Bode
Gravatar
10
0
5
Aug 2018
Top Poster
First Poster
Ruby Bode (Westminster, Vermont, US) says...

We are also obliged to criticize the press when they merely echo the lies of the powerful. In this case, much of the press has taken a side, not just against the policies of the President, but against the election itself on behalf of the parties of war and Wall St. Just as the US has in the past agitated in other countries for coups against democratic outcomes they don’t like, much of the press, including this editorial, is now agitating for a coup here at home.

Gravatar
New
Peter Ford
Gravatar
1
1
0
Aug 2018
Peter Ford (Dallas) says...

Nailed it - Thank you.

Gravatar
New
TB Smith
Gravatar
1
0
1
Aug 2018
TB Smith (Ba, Oklahoma, US) says...

The divisiveness brought on by this shamefully poor excuse for a president has been once again, borne out by this article, and the responses to it .. his most devoted followers are the most gullible and easily swayed sheeple since the \"Kool-Aid party in Jonestown\" ... those who stand up the most fervently to this dictator \"wanabe\", will , inthe end, see him and the fellow purveyors of his garbage rhetoric like FOX News, Alex Jones, Breitbart, etc., crumble and be dumped like stale crackers (pardon the pun) .. we must impeach this tyrant before too much damage is done, either from within or outside our borders.

Gravatar
Regular
Ruby Bode
Gravatar
10
0
5
Aug 2018
Top Poster
First Poster
Ruby Bode (Westminster, Vermont, US) says...

So it’s OK that access to outlets that simply recognize Trump as President is indeed being shut down? But isn’t that exactly what this editorial is against? Should outlets that cheered on Obama’s wars and love of Wall St have likewise been shut down? Only John Birch Society–inspired screeds against Trump indicate the “legitimate” press?

Gravatar
Regular
Ruby Bode
Gravatar
10
0
5
Aug 2018
Top Poster
First Poster
Ruby Bode (Westminster, Vermont, US) says...

TB Smith’s comment in apparent support of the us-vs-them tone of this editorial illustrates why so many people distrust so much of the press (although, again, it appears to be only pro-Trump and anti-imperialist outlets that are actually being shut down): They are promulgating hysterical claims about fascism, Russians, and “crackers” not in the interest of the people, but wholly on behalf of the neoliberal/neoconservative program of Reagan, Clinton, Bush, and Obama to deny Trump the Presidency and even remove him from office – not democratically, but by coup if necessary. That makes the press rather anti-democratic and, indeed, against the people.

Gravatar
New
Amelia Stone
Gravatar
1
0
0
Aug 2018
Amelia Stone (E Dummerston, Vermont, US) says...

Kudos to the Boston Globe for encouraging newspapers across the country to remind us all of the value of a free press, and to the Commons for hearing that call. The NYTimes article, A Free Press Needs You, concludes with the following: \"If you haven’t already, please subscribe to your local papers. Praise them when you think they’ve done a good job and criticize them when you think they could do better. We’re all in this together.\" Today I plan to subscribe.

Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 > Last
 
 

Originally published in The Commons issue #427 (Wednesday, September 27, 2017). This story appeared on page A5.

Related stories

More by Randolph T. Holhut