News and Views

News

Voices

Arts

Life and Work

Milestones

Submit your news

Submit commentary

Support us

Become a member

Advertising

Print advertising

Web advertising

About us

Contact us

Privacy Policy

The Commons
News

WSESU towns try different approach after merger failure

Subcommittee pushes efforts to get towns behind alternative governance structure before December deadline

The Alternative Governance Structures Subcommittee will meet on Thursday, Nov. 16, at 6:30 p.m., in the Dummerston School Library on Schoolhouse Road. For more information, visit www.wssu.k12.vt.us/boards/dummerston.html.

Originally published in The Commons issue #434 (Wednesday, November 15, 2017). This story appeared on page A1.



BRATTLEBORO—Following the resounding defeat by four member towns in the Windham Southeast Supervisory Union of a new unified school district, a new effort is underway to create another proposal by Dec. 26.

This time around, the goal is to improve the current structure of the WSESU to conform to the goals of Act 46, the state’s education reform law, which requires districts to reconcile educational cost, quality, and transparency.

The effort emerged from the work of an Alternative Governance Structure Sub-Committee of the Dummerston School Board, which, according to member Richard Virkstis, was charged with exploring alternatives to the “accelerated merger” option of Act 46.

The merger, which would have created a single pre-kindergarten-through-grade-12 school district with one budget and one school board, was crushed at the polls on Nov. 7.

Despite tax incentives designed to offset the costs associated with the merger, all four towns rejected the proposal. In Putney, 171 voted in favor, and 370 opposed; Dummerston, 91–473; Brattleboro, 375–850; and Guilford, 161–262.

Voters in every one of the four towns would have had to approve the merger for the new district to supersede the WSESU.

WSESU Superintendent Lyle Holliday attributed the defeat to a variety of issues, including voter frustration over Act 46 as a “top-down directive” from the state. “And towns really want to be able to hold on to their school boards and make decisions locally,” she said.

“It’s feeling very different even though all the same questions keep coming up,” said David Schoales, a member of the Brattleboro Town School Board who served as an alternate on the Act 46 Study Committee and who has been participating in the AGS group since August.

According to Virkstis — who characterized the efforts of the Act 46 Study Committee as a “headlong drive to the preferred model” — the subcommittee has invited other towns to the table to adapt the current structure by the state’s Dec. 31 deadline.

School board members and citizens from Brattleboro, Putney, Dummerston, and Guilford have participated in the process. Others also have attended from Vernon, which broke ranks in the original merger negotiations with the other WSESU towns over the issue of school choice.

The group is exploring ways to contain costs and achieve economies of scale while retaining town autonomy and existing school board structures, both Schoales and Virkstis said. Both pointed out the ongoing discussions to craft a policy that would expand school choice within the district towns and to engage in collaborative hiring processes for shared personnel.

Whether it is attached to such an effort, each existing town school board and regional school district must submit a proposal by the December deadline, explained WSESU Superintendent Lyle Holliday.

The state Agency of Education and the secretary of education will review these proposals, and by June 1 will accept or modify the plans from districts throughout the state.

What do you think? Leave us a comment

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.