Not-for-Profit, Award-Winning Community News and Views for Windham County, Vermont • Since 2006
Photo 1

Maret Hosemann/Pixabay

Voices / Viewpoint

The president we deserve

The roots of Donald Trump’s ascendence have been growing for our nation’s entire history. We could be brave enough to face our past and honestly discuss how to repair the damage, but can we handle the truth?

Dan DeWalt, one of the founders of this newspaper, is a woodworker and teacher at Leland & Gray Union High School. He is a longtime activist for social justice, clean energy, and peace.

Newfane

Well, we just celebrated the first birthday of the Trump administration. We must have eaten too much cake at the party, because we’re all feeling sick.

But let’s not be too quick to place the blame for the mess we’re in.

We would like to blame the misogynist-in-chief. We would like to blame the “angry white class” who believed his lies. We would like to blame the 30 to 40 percent of the population who actually agree with the divider-in-chief. We would like to blame the Russians, or other sources of fake news, such as the mouth of our president or Fox News.

But we would be missing the mark.

The U.S.A. has the president it deserves — no more, no less.

How can anyone say such a thing? Please consider the trajectory of history that we have been following up to the present day.

* * *

Over the past few decades, as wealth has been quietly consolidated into the hands of a tiny elite, as the media have been consolidated and purchased by large corporate interests — interests that not only want to control what gets said about them and their ilk but also see news as nothing more than a source of revenue (achieved only by cutting real reporting and news work) — U.S. citizens have passively gone along with the program.

We got excited to see who would be an instant millionaire on TV. As tabloids pried ever deeper into the personal lives of the rich and famous, our infatuation with them and our desire to think that we could somehow be like them grew accordingly.

We laughed and recounted to one another the jollies we were getting from movies and television that increasingly relied on put downs and sarcasm for their humor.

We willingly embraced an epidemic of reality TV shows, allowing ourselves to believe them, while knowing all along that they are contrived, manipulative, and anything but real.

Our current white-supremacist-in-chief came along at the perfect time. He told the lies many wanted to hear. He used the insults, deceit, and innuendo that we have come to admire in our daily media diet to destroy his opponents. He made use of a rigged system (the electoral college) to turn a three-million vote defeat into a sickening victory, and he now reigns supreme.

Democrats and liberals, finally pulling their heads out of the sand, are aghast. How could this liar-in-chief hype the idea of fake news as coming not from Fox News or Alex Jones but from the likes of august institutions like The New York Times?

How indeed?

Have we forgotten the Times’s shame at the false, single-sourced-from-a-known-liar (Ahmed Chalabi) front-page reports by Judith Miller which parroted Chalabi’s false claim of weapons of mass destruction in the hands of Saddam Hussein?

That reporting was arguably the single biggest influence that made the liberal establishment acquiesce to the Bush/Cheney illegal war in Iraq (and the slew of civil-liberty and constitutional violations that followed).

Add to that the infamous reporting of Jayson Blair at the Times (the man who made up stories about his adventures in the world without ever leaving his desk) and you see that the Times itself did a fine job of discrediting the truth of “all the news that’s fit to print.”

* * *

The Democratic “opposition” cries foul when the voice of unreason in the White House calls into question the integrity of the FBI, CIA, or Department of Justice and complains about the “deep state.”

They seem to have forgotten their own attitudes toward the deep state when it was being used by George W. Bush and Dick Cheney to subvert the Constitution and to maraud freely around the world doing harm.

What legacy are these liberals defending exactly?

J. Edgar Hoover’s decades-long record of lawbreaking, spying, and blackmailing of U.S. leaders? The CIA’s record of assassinations, illegal coups, and failures to predict the fall of Communism? The antipathy of Iranians under the U.S.-sponsored Shah? The rise of ISIS? The Justice Department’s debacles at Waco or Ruby Ridge?

Just because the embarrassment-in-chief is abusing these agencies with his rhetoric doesn’t mean that they don’t deserve scrutiny and, when appropriate, condemnation.

* * *

The problem is that our manipulator-in-chief is taking advantage of the deservedly tattered reputation of these various institutions and the Fourth Estate to make his false claims ring true to millions of Americans.

We cannot combat the viciousness, meanness, and lawlessness of this administration by trying to pretend that the institutions that he is attacking have not set themselves up for this by their own compromised actions.

And we will never be able to move forward as a nation until we face the truth about our founding myth.

Most origin myths go back to prehistory, explaining the creation of the world, or the beginnings of a particular people. Prehistory is great, because you can’t do any fact checking, so you accept the myth and construct your society accordingly.

Unfortunately for blind patriots, the American founding myth happened with witnesses and documentation.

So while we worship and embrace our beautiful story of hardy citizens coming to a land of opportunity, making a life for themselves while constructing a government that would grant equality, liberty, and freedom to its denizens, the sorry truth is that a small coterie of white men gave themselves an organizing principle through which they could proceed to steal land, murder its inhabitants, and build an economy based in a significant portion on the enslavement and abuse of a kidnapped and imported Black population.

The U.S. is not alone in having a sordid history. Virtually any nation that has risen to any degree of prominence has done so through war, plunder, and conquest.

So we don’t have to single ourselves out as the only nation to have risen through dishonorable means, but we do have to recognize that fact and figure out what legacy we now have because of it.

* * *

The reactionist-in-chief is a direct response to the presidency of Barack Obama. Obama had the temerity to try to acknowledge (in the faintest and least-obtrusive way possible) that the United States of America left damage in its wake and that we needed to lose a little of our hubris in order to make the world work better.

He mostly broached the topics of American abuse of other countries over the years, leaving untouched the self-destruction that we have inflicted by refusing to face our racist and genocidal beginnings.

Even this mild critique was too much for patriotic America. For this, and especially for being a Black man, he was pilloried and is hated by a large swath of right-wing and even so-called moderate Americans.

The opportunist-in-chief takes advantage of this denial and hatred. He fans the fires of prejudice, and he cloaks the false founding myth with a scrap of shiny red, white, and blue cloth. He drops his tweets like baubles at a Mardi Gras parade, and we run after the little shiny objects while his administration, stocked with men bent on destroying our commonweal for the sake of profits for the few, goes along its merry way, sowing the seeds of our destruction unnoticed or reported on to any significant degree by a Fourth Estate that has lost its bearings by refusing to ask hard questions over too long a period of time.

* * *

No, we have the government we deserve. But the outrageous and blatant abuses of this government may be enough to kick us out of our collective slumber.

We could be brave enough to face our past and honestly discuss how to repair the damage that has been festering for 250 years and that will tear us apart if we continue to ignore it.

These are indeed frightening times. But if we throw up our hands in despair, we are playing directly into the hands of those who want to obscure the past in order to pillage the future.

We should choose instead to face the truth, and to speak that truth — not just to those in power, but also to our neighbors and friends, and not just with words, but also with actions.

We, the People can move us out of this mess, if we only choose to do so.

What do you think? Leave us a comment

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.

Add Comment

* Required information
1000
Out of 56, 14 or 27, which is the smallest?
Captcha Image
Powered by Commentics

Comments (12)

Sort By
Topic: Page One
5/5 (2)
1 2 3 > Last
Gravatar
New
Tamara Stenn
Gravatar
1
0
0
Aug 2018
Tamara Stenn (Brattleboro, Vermont, US) says...

Thanks for writing this Elayne. I was thinking the same thing myself. The silence we received from the hospital is quite deafening. Unfortunately we\'ve had to continue working with the hospital as other (minor) heath issues come up.

Gravatar
New
Judith Skillman
Gravatar
1
0
0
Aug 2018
Judith Skillman (Newcastle, US) says...

Excellent and informative writing about the media and about the state of our nation. We must support the press speak truth to power, now more than ever before.

Gravatar
Regular
Ruby Bode
Gravatar
10
0
5
Aug 2018
Top Poster
First Poster
Ruby Bode (Westminster, Vermont, US) says...

We are also obliged to criticize the press when they merely echo the lies of the powerful. In this case, much of the press has taken a side, not just against the policies of the President, but against the election itself on behalf of the parties of war and Wall St. Just as the US has in the past agitated in other countries for coups against democratic outcomes they don’t like, much of the press, including this editorial, is now agitating for a coup here at home.

Gravatar
New
Peter Ford
Gravatar
1
1
0
Aug 2018
Peter Ford (Dallas) says...

Nailed it - Thank you.

Gravatar
New
TB Smith
Gravatar
1
0
1
Aug 2018
TB Smith (Ba, Oklahoma, US) says...

The divisiveness brought on by this shamefully poor excuse for a president has been once again, borne out by this article, and the responses to it .. his most devoted followers are the most gullible and easily swayed sheeple since the \"Kool-Aid party in Jonestown\" ... those who stand up the most fervently to this dictator \"wanabe\", will , inthe end, see him and the fellow purveyors of his garbage rhetoric like FOX News, Alex Jones, Breitbart, etc., crumble and be dumped like stale crackers (pardon the pun) .. we must impeach this tyrant before too much damage is done, either from within or outside our borders.

Gravatar
Regular
Ruby Bode
Gravatar
10
0
5
Aug 2018
Top Poster
First Poster
Ruby Bode (Westminster, Vermont, US) says...

So it’s OK that access to outlets that simply recognize Trump as President is indeed being shut down? But isn’t that exactly what this editorial is against? Should outlets that cheered on Obama’s wars and love of Wall St have likewise been shut down? Only John Birch Society–inspired screeds against Trump indicate the “legitimate” press?

Gravatar
Regular
Ruby Bode
Gravatar
10
0
5
Aug 2018
Top Poster
First Poster
Ruby Bode (Westminster, Vermont, US) says...

TB Smith’s comment in apparent support of the us-vs-them tone of this editorial illustrates why so many people distrust so much of the press (although, again, it appears to be only pro-Trump and anti-imperialist outlets that are actually being shut down): They are promulgating hysterical claims about fascism, Russians, and “crackers” not in the interest of the people, but wholly on behalf of the neoliberal/neoconservative program of Reagan, Clinton, Bush, and Obama to deny Trump the Presidency and even remove him from office – not democratically, but by coup if necessary. That makes the press rather anti-democratic and, indeed, against the people.

Gravatar
New
Amelia Stone
Gravatar
1
0
0
Aug 2018
Amelia Stone (E Dummerston, Vermont, US) says...

Kudos to the Boston Globe for encouraging newspapers across the country to remind us all of the value of a free press, and to the Commons for hearing that call. The NYTimes article, A Free Press Needs You, concludes with the following: \"If you haven’t already, please subscribe to your local papers. Praise them when you think they’ve done a good job and criticize them when you think they could do better. We’re all in this together.\" Today I plan to subscribe.

Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 > Last
 
 

Originally published in The Commons issue #446 (Wednesday, February 14, 2018). This story appeared on page D1.

Related stories

More by Dan DeWalt