Not-for-Profit, Award-Winning Community News and Views for Windham County, Vermont • Since 2006
Voices / Letters from readers

Why shouldn’t rules be applied to gun ownership?

Thoughts on reducing gun violence:

It has become clear to most Americans that we desperately need to curtail all types of gun violence. The tragic consequences of our current lack of firearms regulation is too much to bear. We need to take action now.

A reasonable place to start the conversation is to compare gun ownership to driving. It’s commonly accepted that to operate a motor vehicle, everyone should be subject to reasonable restrictions and regulations and drive responsibly:

• Every driver must pass a driving test.

• Drivers must carry their license with them while operating a motor vehicle. Every vehicle driven on our roads must be registered and in most states inspected regularly. Drivers must have their license and registration with them while driving. Drivers must present a valid license and automobile registration at every routine traffic stop.

• We all accept all these regulations as reasonable and sensible.

• When you buy a car from an individual you have to transfer the title and register the vehicle in your name before you can legally drive it.

Why shouldn’t similar ones be applied to gun ownership?

For example:

• All guns should also be registered. Gun owners should be required to pass a comprehensive gun-safety course — one that would emphasize the moral obligation to use a firearm safely and responsibly — and do so every 10 years. The systems for registration of motor vehicles and driver’s license testing are already in place in all states. It would be reasonably straightforward to modify them to register guns and test and license gun owners.

• Background checks for all gun owners, of course. Just common sense.

• Ban the sale of assault rifles to anyone regardless of age.

• Limit clip capacity to 8 rounds.

• Revoke “open carry” laws. An openly visible firearm just incites a fear reaction.

• Require background checks and a reasonable waiting period for all gun purchases, including gun show sales and private sales.

• Any individual owning 10 firearms or more could be open to closer scrutiny.

• Any person purchasing a large quantity of ammunition could be open to closer scrutiny.

• A federal agency similar to the NSA should be established just to monitor social media and other platforms for threatening postings. This agency should have the power to follow up and enforce firearms regulations and to do further background checks.

Only a comprehensive approach to gun regulation can hope to have a significant impact on gun violence. Vermont led the way on civil unions. We should lead the way on sensible, effective gun-control measures.

Call or write your legislators and the governor’s office if you agree.

John Bentley

Like what we do? Help us keep doing it!

We rely on the donations and financial support of our readers to help make The Commons available to all. Please join us today.

What do you think? Leave us a comment

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.

Add Comment

* Required information
Is it true or false that green is a number?
Captcha Image
Powered by Commentics

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first!

Originally published in The Commons issue #449 (Wednesday, March 7, 2018). This story appeared on page E2.

Related stories

More by John Bentley