Not-for-Profit, Award-Winning Community News and Views for Windham County, Vermont • Since 2006
Voices / Letters from readers

WRMUED, honor the promises to voters

Prior to the votes in Windham, Brookline, Newfane, Jamaica, and Townshend, our Act 46 Study Committee explained to us in writing what a “yes” vote for unification would mean:

• “Day-to-day operation of our schools will not change. They will continue to provide a high-quality education for our students.”

• “Students will continue going to their town’s elementary school, and then to Leland & Gray.”

• “All five schools will have a school-based advisory committee that will provide feedback to the new, larger board on issues and concerns that are important to their school and town. The membership of these committees is expected to include parents, townspeople, the principal, a member of the board from that town, and any others concerned with the operation of the school.”

With these promises, four of our towns agreed to unify, while Windham opted out.

There are currently two drastic (and, per the July 16 public meeting, unpopular) proposals that would change the nature of our schools. There is now a third proposal that would move our sixth grades to Leland & Gray.

All three proposals violate the first two agreements listed above. Additionally, the advisory committees haven’t been given life yet in our schools.

For some reason, the new unified district seems committed to presenting proposals that continually violate the commitments made to our communities when we chose to vote “yes."

Either we were duped then, or we’re being disregarded now.

First things first: Our new school district, in presenting any plans to us, should honor their stated commitments to the voters. Otherwise, what use was our participation in the democratic process?

To the newly minted WRMUED: Honor the vote.

Chris Webb

Like what we do? Help us keep doing it!

We rely on the donations and financial support of our readers to help make The Commons available to all. Please join us today.

What do you think? Leave us a comment

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.

Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /home/commons/public_html/site/sitenext/ in /home/commons/public_html/site/sitenext/helpers/comments/frontend/index.php on line 15

Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /home/commons/public_html/site/sitenext/ in /home/commons/public_html/site/sitenext/helpers/comments/frontend/index.php on line 15

Add Comment

* Required information
Type the numbers for four hundred seventy-two.
Captcha Image
Powered by Commentics

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first!

Originally published in The Commons issue #471 (Wednesday, August 8, 2018). This story appeared on page D3.

Related stories

More by Chris Webb