The Commons
News

Eight possible sites named for public housing

Housing Authority plans to build 152 affordable units in three years

Originally published in The Commons issue #162 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012).


BRATTLEBORO—The Brattleboro Housing Authority Housing Alternative Study committee has revealed its short list of eight potential public housing sites..

Adam Hubbard, a committee member and a project manager with Stevens & Associates, told an audience of about 25 gathered in the Hayes Court community room last Thursday that the BHA-owned Melrose Terrace and Hayes Court properties also made the cut.

The other sites included BHA’s Moore Court property on School Street, the large parking area next to Academy School on Western Avenue, a parcel owned by the Austine School, the Esancy Property on Western Avenue near Exit 2, the R.S. Roberts property on Fairground Road, and the Hannigan Field property on Partridge Road in Guilford.

In the wake of flooding from Tropical Storm Irene last year, the housing authority has embarked on a redevelopment of affordable housing options for its tenants.

The BHA, with help from Stevens & Associates, the town planning department, and community members serving on the 14-member planning committee, have an aggressive three-year timeline to build 152 new affordable housing units in town.

“We may end up with multiple sites around town,” said Hubbard. “The challenge for the housing authority is to build efficiently.”

He said that a complex of single-story structures like Melrose would not be built today. The layout does not allow the allotted land to be used efficiently.

The projected cost stands between $10 to $12 million, said BHA Executive Director Chris Hart.

In its purpose and need statements, the committee said it wants “to provide low to moderate income residents, seniors, and individuals with disabilities with a safe, accessible, affordable, and appealing place to live.”

The committee continued, “Any proposal will need to be mutually beneficial to the residents, the community, and Whetstone Brook. The project will need to meet all regulatory and funding requirements of private, local, state, and federal bodies.”

Committee members reviewed a list of 25 properties before quickly whittling the list to eight. According to Hubbard, the chosen eight will receive deeper site and feasibility studies to determine suitability.

Review criteria included safety and security, accessibility, proximity to services, cost, integration with existing communities, ease of building on site, flood hazard/natural resource impacts, and aesthetics.

According to the committee, the BHA owns and manages 284 affordable housing units with 152 located at Melrose and Hayes.

Damage from Tropical Storm Irene last August highlighted complexities facing the housing authority. Post-Irene, the BHA commissioners rebuilt homes damaged at Melrose to rehouse 80 displaced residents. Meanwhile, the BHA said it knew it needed a long-term solution.

According to Hart, most of BHA’s Melrose Terrace property, designed for senior and disabled tenants, sits in the Whetstone Brook’s flood plain.

1 | 2 | 3 | Next


What do you think? Leave us a comment

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.

Comments (1)

Topic: COMM-0162.bratt.BHAmeeting
Facebookdel.icio.usStumbleUponDiggGoogle+Twitter
Gravatar
Full StarFull StarFull StarFull StarFull Star
Tom Finnell (Brattleboro, VT) says...
I’m a Housing Commissioner and a member of the Committee, and I just wanted to remark. We started with a list of properties compiled by Stevens & Associates that might be available and were considered worth studying. Most were removed from the list for reasons such as: too expensive, too far from services, too hilly, no water, etc. The eight “survivors” will be carefully vetted, with a rough development plan provided for each. No decisions have been made at this time. As ... Read More
26th July 2012 10:00am
Page 1 of 1

Add Comment

* Required information
(will not be published)
Type the numbers for four hundred seventy-two.
 
Enter answer:
 
Notify me of new comments via email.
 
Remember my form details on this computer.
 
I have read and understand the privacy policy. *
 






News and Views

News

Voices

Arts

Life and Work

Milestones

Submit your news

Submit commentary

Support us

Become a member

Advertising

Print advertising

Web advertising

About us

Contact us