News and Views

News

Voices

Arts

Life and Work

Milestones

Submit your news

Submit commentary

Support us

Become a member

Advertising

Print advertising

Web advertising

About us

Contact us

The Commons
Town and Village

Dummerston Selectboard warned of Route 30 dangers

Originally published in The Commons issue #181 (Wednesday, December 5, 2012).


DUMMERSTON—Lew Sorenson, the town’s representative to the Windham Regional Commission (WRC), cautioned the Selectboard about several dangerous traffic patterns in the town.

“Route 30 is now designated as a high-crash zone statewide,” warned Sorenson, who serves on the regional planning agency’s transportation committee, at the board’s Nov. 28 meeting.

“There are warrants that justify a left-turn lane at the covered bridge,” he said.

He said that danger arises when a vehicle is sitting in the southbound lane of Route 30 waiting for the northbound lane to clear before crossing the West River via the West Dummerston covered bridge to Camp Arden Road.

In 2008, the Selectboard wrote a letter to the Vermont Agency of Transportation (AOT) requesting that turn lanes be created in both the northbound and southbound lanes at the covered bridge intersection.

Sorenson also stressed how dangerous the intersection of Route 30 and Williamsville Road, at the Newfane town line, has become. He suggested widening the shoulder and providing parking for the recreational area on the West River.

“I am always been amazed that Dummerston hasn’t done more with that potential,” he said.

Sorenson suggested to the board that the town apply for assistance under the federal Safe Routes for Schools program, which could provide funds for the town to work toward “providing a path for pedestrians or a speed feedback sign that is available under that program.”

According to the AOT’s High Crash Locations Report 2006-2010, an average 6,188 cars traveled each day along the stretch of Route 30.

Over the five years of the report, 12 crashes occurred, resulting in one death and nine injuries. Another five accidents caused property damage.


What do you think? Leave us a comment

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.

Comments

No comments yet.

Add Comment

* Required information
(will not be published)
Type the numbers for four hundred seventy-two.
 
Enter answer:
 
Notify me of new comments via email.
 
Remember my form details on this computer.
 
I have read and understand the privacy policy. *