$(document).ready(function() { $(window).scroll(function() { if ($('body').height() <= ($(window).height() + $(window).scrollTop()+500)) { $('#upnext').css('display','block'); }else { $('#upnext').css('display','none'); } }); });
Not-for-Profit, Award-Winning Community News and Views for Windham County, Vermont • Since 2006

Tax rate, town budget up for discussion at Annual Representative Town Meeting

BRATTLEBORO—Now that the ballots for the Police-Fire project are counted, it’s time to vote on the fiscal year 2017 municipal budget.

Town Meeting Members will reassemble Saturday, March 19, at 8:30 a.m., in the Brattleboro Area Middle School Multi-Purpose Room to vote on 30 articles.

Meeting Members will vote on two budgets, the municipal and town school.

The largest portion of the proposed $16.1 million municipal budget will go toward salaries and benefits for Brattleboro’s more than 130 employees.

“At this point, we’re not contemplating any specific cuts in services,” said Selectboard Chair David Gartenstein.

The budget represents level service, he said.

“Cutting costs have been at the top of the priority list for every Selectboard,” Gartenstein added. “There really isn’t any low-hanging fruit to be pruned from this budget."

The proposed tax increase is 1.82 cents per $100 of assessed value. With the addition of 1.5 cents more for additional borrowing for the Police-Fire Project, the tax increase for fiscal year 2017 will be 3.32 cents per $100 of assessed value.

Meeting Members will also be asked to vote on the fiscal year 2017 town school budget. This $15.9 million budget represents an estimated spending of $15,292 per equalized pupil which is 1.8 percent lower than spending for the current year.

Like what we do? Help us keep doing it!

We rely on the donations and financial support of our readers to help make The Commons available to all. Please join us today.

What do you think? Leave us a comment

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.


We are currently reconfiguring our comments software. Please check back if you’d like to read or leave comments on this story. —The editors

Originally published in The Commons issue #348 (Wednesday, March 16, 2016). This story appeared on page A1.

Share this story


Related stories

More by Olga Peters