$(document).ready(function() { $(window).scroll(function() { if ($('body').height() <= ($(window).height() + $(window).scrollTop()+500)) { $('#upnext').css('display','block'); }else { $('#upnext').css('display','none'); } }); });
Not-for-Profit, Award-Winning Community News and Views for Windham County, Vermont • Since 2006
Photo 1

Mike Faher/VTDigger and The Commons

The five major candidates for governor — from left, Bruce Lisman, Peter Galbraith, Sue Minter, Matt Dunne, and Phil Scott — came to Brattleboro on June 28 for a debate sponsored by the Brattleboro Area Chamber of Commerce.


Candidates spar on issues of economics

Five gubernatorial hopefuls propose financial fixes for southern Vermont

BRATTLEBORO—At a gubernatorial debate here June 28, Republican Phil Scott declared that the economy “should be the issue of this campaign.”

He likely didn’t need to convince an estimated crowd of 170 jammed into Brattleboro American Legion Post 5. Three Democrats and two Republicans spent most of their morning here talking about economic initiatives, affordability, and small businesses.

They pitched some specific ideas for southern Vermont in light of a recent report on the area’s economic problems. And they jostled on statewide issues including taxes and raising the minimum wage, a topic that came up repeatedly throughout the forum sponsored by Brattleboro Area Chamber of Commerce.

“You want to talk about making Vermont more affordable? Let’s raise the minimum wage,” Democrat Peter Galbraith said. “Whatever we do for affordable housing is a drop in the bucket. But a $15 minimum wage by 2021 ... that is the best anti-poverty program we could have.”

Scott, on the other hand, said a $15 minimum wage would be a “mistake” because it would hurt employers.

“Let me be clear: I think that everyone should make more money in Vermont,” Scott said. “I think that’s the end goal. How we get there gets kind of messy.”

Facing a challenge

Scott, a Berlin resident and construction business owner who has been the state’s lieutenant governor for six years, faces a challenge in the Aug. 9 primary from fellow Republican Bruce Lisman, a Shelburne resident and retired businessman.

They took the stage at American Legion Post 5 with three Democratic candidates. Galbraith, of Townshend, is a former U.S. ambassador and Windham County state senator; Matt Dunne, of Hartland, is a former state senator and Google executive; and Sue Minter, of Waterbury, is a former House member who most recently served as Vermont’s transportation secretary.

Also vying for the Democratic nomination for governor are Cris Ericson of Chester and H. Brooke Paige of Washington.

Moderator Chris Graff wasted no time asking the five candidates at the June 28 forum about the economic fate of southern Vermont, quoting directly from a December 2015 state report detailing the woes of Bennington and Windham counties.

Minter touted her own innovation and investment initiatives, citing in particular the need for investing in infrastructure and affordable housing. She also praised the Windham region’s Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy and its internship program via the Six Colleges Collaborative.

“Businesses can’t grow because they can’t find a qualified workforce,” she said. “That’s why I’m excited about your workforce development program.”

Dunne said he would focus on issues such as housing and poverty.

‘The electricity of our time’

“We also need to bring the electricity of our time, which is high-speed internet, to all of southern Vermont,” he said. “If we do that, we can actually support our entrepreneurs, create an entire community ... that are telecommuters.”

Dunne also told the crowd that, as someone who lives south of Route 4, “I have a unique understanding of the southern part of this state.”

But Galbraith laid claim to his home county.

During his two-term Senate stint, he said, he directed funding to Southeastern Vermont Economic Development Strategies; helped get cellular service for Newfane after Tropical Storm Irene; secured legislative approval of a 5 megawatt landfill solar proposal in Brattleboro; and extended a Vermont Yankee-related property tax break in Vernon.

“As governor, I’m going to be an advocate for Windham County, as I was as your senator,” Galbraith said.

Scott, both during the forum and in an interview afterward, said he doesn’t believe the economic challenges in the southern part of the state are much different than those elsewhere in Vermont.

“I’ll be putting out an economic plan in the really near future that will address a lot of these issues,” he said.

Scott cited two statewide problems that he believes need attention — population loss and an aging demographic. “We have a shrinking workforce,” he said. “We need to repopulate that 25 to 45 age group throughout Vermont.”

Lisman, citing the 2014 closure of Vermont Yankee, said the state can’t afford to lose more employers. Echoing a common complaint in this part of the state, Lisman said “economic growth has been quite modest, particularly outside of Chittenden County.”

Lisman talked about workforce development and said the state should build “strong relationships” with job creators. He also said Vermont must nurture its small businesses, because “we can keep them right here if we give them the right level of support.”

One way to support small businesses throughout the state, Lisman said, is to be cautious about any proposed minimum wage increases. The state’s base wage is currently $9.60 per hour and is scheduled to rise to $10.50 by 2018.

Lisman said he would favor raising the minimum wage “slowly, over time,” but he also called for “restraint” on that topic. Given the number of small businesses in the state, he argued that “we’re talking about squeezing a significant part of our population” when mandating a higher minimum wage.

Scott, who owns a construction business, worried that raising the minimum wage will have a ripple effect by causing additional salary increases farther up the pay scale. “This just ratchets up the cost of living,” he said.

“We have to grow the economy,” Scott said. “We have to grow wages at the same time. And that will be done through competition.”

Who’s being squeezed?

Galbraith, who said he got into the governor’s race mainly due to the minimum wage issue, took umbrage at Lisman’s remark about “squeezing” small business owners.

“Actually, the people who are being squeezed are the people who are doing the hard work,” Galbraith said. “And we the taxpayers are being squeezed because we are subsidizing the low-wage employers with the earned-income tax credit.”

Dunne said he’s in favor of a $15 minimum wage “over a period of time.” Echoing Galbraith’s claim that raising the minimum wage will save the state money, Dunne said any savings should be reinvested in Vermont-based companies.

“Imagine a state where the Agency of Commerce is focused on working with all the small businesses in Vermont to be able to boost their sales 20 or 30 percent,” he said.

Minter also said she supports moving toward a $15 minimum wage, though she didn’t commit to a time frame for implementation. “I’m looking to a more gradual step-up, as we have started already,” she said.

She followed that by reiterating her plea for investing in Vermont businesses. As an example, Minter cited the success of recent public investment in Barre infrastructure, saying that has subsequently leveraged a much larger amount of private investment.

“That’s what I want to do in communities around Vermont,” Minter said. “My Agency of Commerce is going to be focused on customer service for the business community and creating great opportunities for growth.”

Like what we do? Help us keep doing it!

We rely on the donations and financial support of our readers to help make The Commons available to all. Please join us today.

What do you think? Leave us a comment

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.


We are currently reconfiguring our comments software. Please check back if you’d like to read or leave comments on this story. —The editors

Originally published in The Commons issue #364 (Wednesday, July 6, 2016). This story appeared on page A1.

Share this story


Related stories

More by Mike Faher