$(document).ready(function() { $(window).scroll(function() { if ($('body').height() <= ($(window).height() + $(window).scrollTop()+500)) { $('#upnext').css('display','block'); }else { $('#upnext').css('display','none'); } }); });
Not-for-Profit, Award-Winning Community News and Views for Windham County, Vermont • Since 2006
News

Wind developer plans changes to Stiles Brook proposal

Iberdrola will disclose revisions at public meetings in Windham and Grafton

WINDHAM—The controversial Stiles Brook Wind Project proposal is about to change.

Developer Iberdrola Renewables has scheduled two public meetings to discuss revisions to the project’s size and its economic impacts. Currently, plans call for a 28-turbine wind energy site that would be Vermont’s largest.

The sessions are scheduled for 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. Oct. 4 at Windham Elementary School, and 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. Oct. 5 at Grafton Elementary School.

Prior to those meetings, the developer isn’t detailing its proposed changes at Stiles Brook.

“We have been meeting, talking, and listening to residents of Windham and Grafton for a long time now,” Iberdrola spokesman Paul Copleman said. “Based on those discussions, particularly as folks have discussed the positive long-term effects the wind farm could deliver to their communities, we look forward to presenting changes to the project footprint and to the community benefits package.”

Stiff opposition

The notice of pending changes to the Stiles Brook proposal led Windham Selectboard Chairman Frank Seawright — a vocal opponent of the project — to speculate that Iberdrola’s initial proposal was “fictitious.”

“They are behaving as usual — keeping everything secret until the last minute and all the while claiming to be working with the community,” Seawright said. “The town has asked nothing of them except that they go away.”

After years of planning work, Iberdrola Renewables in October 2015 disclosed plans for 28 turbines capable of generating a combined 96.6 megawatts of power. Twenty of those windmills would be in Windham, with the remaining eight in Grafton.

The project would be constructed in Stiles Brook Forest, a 5,000-acre property owned by New Hampshire-based Meadowsend Timberlands Ltd. Construction is expected in 2019 if the proposal receives the necessary state permits.

The project has provoked staunch opposition among some who are concerned that large turbines will negatively impact aesthetics, home values, and human health. Officials in Windham, where the town plan bans commercial wind turbines, earlier this year asked the developer to walk away from Stiles Brook.

Continuing campaign

But Iberdrola has fought back, accusing opponents of spreading inaccurate information. In addition to being a large source of renewable energy, Stiles Brook Wind also would pump a total of $1 million annually into the two towns’ coffers, the company has said.

It now appears that those numbers — and the dimensions of the project itself — may be changing.

Iberdrola recently sent a flier to Windham residents calling an Oct. 4 public meeting where residents will have “the opportunity to ask questions about recent changes to the project footprint, community benefits package, and the development of the Stiles Brook Wind Project.”

Though Grafton residents didn’t immediately receive a similar flier, Copleman said there will be a similar meeting in that town the day after Windham’s session.

While it’s up to the state Public Service Board to approve or reject the Stiles Brook project, Iberdrola has pledged to abide by the results of legal, Australian ballot elections in November in each of the towns.

Some have expressed concern that Grafton won’t be ready for a vote on Election Day, Nov. 8. Grafton Selectboard Chairman Ron Pilette said the Selectboard may decide that matter at its Oct. 3 meeting.

Windham already has committed to a Nov. 8 vote on the wind proposal. The ballot language adopted by the town wouldn’t be affected by changes in Iberdrola’s site plan: It asks only whether residents “support development of the Stiles Brook Wind Project, as proposed by Iberdrola Renewables.”

Debate on impact

Seawright speculated that the developer might propose “fewer turbines and perhaps more money.” But even if Stiles Brook wind gets smaller, Seawright said that won’t change his opinion.

Seawright believes the project “will do absolutely nothing to affect climate change” given the volume of fossil-fuel use worldwide. And he contends Stiles Brook’s environmental impacts are unacceptable regardless of how many turbines are constructed.

“A scaled-down plan will still require road building, wetland destruction [and] removing the intact ecosystem there, which absorbs water and minimizes the consequences of the increase in heavy downpours” caused by climate change, Seawright said.

Copleman offered a very different view of the Stiles Brook proposal.

“As climate change represents a threat to the way of life for so many Vermont businesses and families, as well as the Stiles Brook tract itself, we’re looking for ways that a community partnership can help mitigate climate change and deliver benefits for all residents of Grafton and Windham,” Copleman said.

Like what we do? Help us keep doing it!

We rely on the donations and financial support of our readers to help make The Commons available to all. Please join us today.

What do you think? Leave us a comment

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.

Comments

We are currently reconfiguring our comments software. Please check back if you’d like to read or leave comments on this story. —The editors

Originally published in The Commons issue #376 (Wednesday, September 28, 2016). This story appeared on page A1.

Share this story

Links

Related stories

More by Mike Faher