$(document).ready(function() { $(window).scroll(function() { if ($('body').height() <= ($(window).height() + $(window).scrollTop()+500)) { $('#upnext').css('display','block'); }else { $('#upnext').css('display','none'); } }); });
Not-for-Profit, Award-Winning Community News and Views for Windham County, Vermont • Since 2006

Feds commit to local public meeting on Vermont Yankee sale

VERNON—Concerned citizens soon will have a face-to-face opportunity to question the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission about the sale of Vermont Yankee.

A spokesman says the NRC has “informally committed” to attending a future meeting of the Vermont Nuclear Decommissioning Citizens Advisory Panel to discuss the plant’s proposed license transfer to NorthStar Group Services.

The commitment came after multiple requests for the NRC to travel to Vermont for a public meeting. A date for the meeting has not yet been set, but commission spokesman Neil Sheehan said it will happen after Vermont Yankee’s revised Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report is submitted.

That report “is due in sometime soon — likely this month — and will further flesh out what NorthStar has in mind with respect to the Vermont Yankee decommissioning process, including timelines,” Sheehan said. “Having that report in hand should provide for a more fruitful discussion.”

Vermont Yankee owner Entergy in November announced plans to sell the shut-down Vernon plant to NorthStar, a New York-based decommissioning company.

NorthStar has promised to have most of the site — with the exception of a spent fuel storage facility — decommissioned and restored by the end of 2030. That’s decades faster than Entergy had been planning.

The change in ownership requires approval from both the Vermont Public Service Board and the NRC.

The state last month agreed to hold two public hearings in Vernon this year to take public comment on the proposed sale. The first such hearing is scheduled for 7 p.m. March 14 at Vernon Elementary School, with an informational session preceding the hearing at 6 p.m.

But the NRC was slow to commit to such a meeting.

The commission had a sit-down in January with Entergy and NorthStar, but that happened at the NRC’s Maryland headquarters. Officials repeatedly had said a public hearing or meeting in Vermont was not a required part of the license-transfer process.

That prompted action from the Vermont Nuclear Decommissioning Citizens Advisory Panel. Fifteen panel members sent a letter urging the NRC to hold a public meeting in Vermont.

“The public needs to be listened to, and the public needs to have the opportunity to say what we want to say,” Kate O’Connor, the advisory panel’s chairwoman, said at the time.

On March 7, Vermont’s congressional delegation threw its support behind the citizen panel’s request in a letter to the NRC.

U.S. Rep. Peter Welch, D-Vt., and U.S. Sens. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., wrote that it is “imperative that state and local stakeholders have meaningful opportunities to provide the NRC with input regarding the license transfer and decommissioning proposal.”

“While the proposed license transfer has the potential to bring significant benefits to the local community, it it nevertheless a complex transaction deserving of thorough scrutiny,” the lawmakers wrote.

Like what we do? Help us keep doing it!

We rely on the donations and financial support of our readers to help make The Commons available to all. Please join us today.

What do you think? Leave us a comment

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.


We are currently reconfiguring our comments software. Please check back if you’d like to read or leave comments on this story. —The editors

This story has not yet appeared in print.

Share this story


Related stories

More by Mike Faher