Not-for-Profit, Award-Winning Community News and Views for Windham County, Vermont • Since 2006
Voices / Letters from readers

Voters should elect a diverse slate of justices of the peace

Do you know the duties of the justices of the peace whom you vote for on Election Day? Most of us don’t, and usually it doesn’t matter because there are not candidates clamoring for the position.

If you think about it, it is rare to have more candidates than positions. The number of JPs is based on population, and their duties are limited to five basic areas: elections, tax hearings, marriages, notary, and (when commissioned by the Vermont Supreme Court) magistrate.

In these contentious times, the role of your JP is more important than ever. JPs are members of the Board of Civil Authority, which is responsible for conducting elections and for hearing and deciding property tax appeals. What could be more important to citizens than fair elections and just property values?

If perception is reality, having all the justices of the peace lean one way or the other politically could present the perception of bias. In reality, a balanced board is a fairer way of decision-making and of representing all citizens of a community. A one-sided panel at election time requires the town to find volunteers from the underrepresented party to assist.

When you cast your vote, please give consideration to voting for a slate of justices of the peace that is diverse. In Newfane, three Republican candidates are vying for spots as justices of the peace on a panel that is currently all Democratic.

One step toward creating diversity.

Cristine A. White
West Dummerston

Like what we do? Help us keep doing it!

We rely on the donations and financial support of our readers to help make The Commons available to all. Please join us today.

What do you think? Leave us a comment

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.


We are currently reconfiguring our comments software. Please check back if you’d like to read or leave comments on this story. —The editors

Originally published in The Commons issue #583 (Wednesday, October 14, 2020). This story appeared on page B4.

Share this story



Related stories

More by Cristine A. White