$(document).ready(function() { $(window).scroll(function() { if ($('body').height() <= ($(window).height() + $(window).scrollTop()+500)) { $('#upnext').css('display','block'); }else { $('#upnext').css('display','none'); } }); });
Not-for-Profit, Award-Winning Community News and Views for Windham County, Vermont • Since 2006
Voices / Letters from readers

Elections and policies are for sale -- pure and simple

Like others, I’ve been angry since the Citizens United decision, and before, about the role moneyed interests play in deciding our national elections and policies. And that anger has been spreading.

There are now at least seven serious proposals to amend the Constitution, particularly to say that corporations are not people.

That’s important. But it would do nothing about the underlying problem: that our elections and policies are for sale. The fact that they’re for sale for some reason gets less attention than the fact that they are bought.

We are shocked by the corruption in other countries, where elected and other officials are on the take. Why are we not equally shocked by the corruption here?

Colluding Congresspeople say “My goodness, no! Those gifts [that come especially when big business interests are at stake] in no way affect my votes!” And donors say they’re only trying to help the best people get elected.

But they’re usually lying. Votes are being bought and sold. If they weren’t for sale, there’d be no need for a Constitutional amendment.

And the selling could be pretty effectively stopped, if there were total public financing of campaigns.

It would also help if Congressional ethics committees would acknowledge vote-selling as their basic ethical problem.

But, until it’s plainly named and widely discussed, there’ll be no adequate pressure for change, our corruptness will continue, and a Constitutional amendment only slow its growth.

Byron Stookey
Brattleboro

Like what we do? Help us keep doing it!

We rely on the donations and financial support of our readers to help make The Commons available to all. Please join us today.

What do you think? Leave us a comment

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.

Comments

We are currently reconfiguring our comments software. Please check back if you’d like to read or leave comments on this story. —The editors

Originally published in The Commons issue #160 (Wednesday, July 11, 2012).

Share this story

Links

Related stories

More by Byron Stookey