rowcount: 0 Welcome to THE COMMONS -- News and Views for Windham County, Vermont
Not-for-Profit, Award-Winning Community News and Views for Windham County, Vermont • Since 2006

Quality at the cross roads

Windham Regional Commission gathers input on Route 9 and 100 downtown intersection

Interested individuals are encouraged to send comment to Meves by email or phone (802-257-4547, ext. 108).

WILMINGTON—Seen by many drivers passing through town as the intersection of Routes 9 and 100, and known as East, West, South, and North Main streets to residents, the intersection of the two state highways carries the perception of acting as a vehicular choke point for an average of 12,000 vehicles each day.

The Windham Regional Commission (WRC) took feedback on Monday from residents and business owners about how such traffic affects their daily lives and businesses at Wilmington’s compact downtown intersection.

Route 9 is the only major east-west highway in southern Vermont, and it is used heavily by tractor trailers, said WRC Executive Director Chris Campany. It is also part of the national highway system and thus subject to certain requirements, like accommodating tractor trailers.

Meanwhile, Route 100 through Wilmington serves as the main north-south thoroughfare and the primary route to the Mount Snow ski resort in West Dover, Campany said, though he stressed that the discussion was not about one development.

Campany and his colleagues, planners Matt Mann and Cullen Meves, asked the audience a series of three questions about how the traffic affected their daily lives and possible solutions. They hoped to gather feedback from residents, business owners, resort owners and affiliates, and employees who commute in town.

“So what are the real effects? What are the real impacts?” Campany asked.

The commission hopes to use the audience members’ experiences to round out quantitive data gathered regularly by federal, state, and local agencies.

The commission will accept comments until Friday, Dec. 7. The survey will appear online at The information will be compiled into a report available to local officials and planners.

According to Mann, the Vermont Agency of Transportation (AOT) daily traffic counts for 2010, the most recent data available, averaged approximately 5,000 vehicles traveling Route 9, and 7,000 vehicles traveling Route 100.

The intersection had also been designated a high crash location based on the number of accidents between 2006 and 2010, said Mann.

Adapting to the traffic

The audience of about 40 had few complaints about traffic volume. Local business owners said they preferred that more people visited.

Susan Haughwout, town clerk and Selectboard member, viewed the traffic congestion as cyclical.

The town experienced heavy traffic during “big ski weekends,” holidays, she said, or events like the May 14 Tough Mudder, a 10-to-12-mile obstacle course designed by British Special Forces which raises money for the Wounded Warrior Project.

Haughwout, who works in the town offices downtown, described a car accident between her and a driver who assumed the parking area along Main Street was the right-turn lane for Route 100 north.

Most people can stomach a busy weekend, a woman in the audience said.

According to Mann, May 14 traffic counts were 10,000 cars traveling to Mount Snow, which hosted the Tough Mudder event.

Many of the residents recounted the ways that they use side roads to bypass the main streets during busy traffic times.

According to Cliff Duncan, a local business owner and former traffic committee member, the town has long discussed the intersection.

The discussion went so far as the traffic committee proposing AOT construct two tunnels cutting from south of the village and rejoining Route 100 north of the downtown. Duncan said the tunnel plan didn’t jazz AOT.

Other concerns

To the WRC’s surprise, the audience expressed other concerns. At the top of the list: pedestrian safety, vehicles not stopping before turning north on Route 100, tractor trailers’ speed, and the noise from the trucks’ compression-release engine brakes (Jake brakes).

The audience highlighted a faulty pedestrian crossing signal at the intersection, issues with the timing of the traffic lights, hard-to-see crosswalks, and the absence of measures for traffic calming.

Ambulance driver and Selectboard member Randall Terk said ambulances still can navigate the intersection even during traffic jams.

The Deerfield Valley Transit Association’s MOOver bus, however, has had a harder time with traffic jams and has had its schedule knocked out of shape by traffic backups, he said.

Campany asked the audience if Wilmington had considered designing “gateways” to the town.

A gateway design, included features like signage, pillars, and narrowing of the road, can help slow traffic and signals to visitors that they’re entering a village and residential downtown, he said.

Mann and Campany also discussed negotiating with AOT to take over partial responsibility for maintaining the highways in Wilmington.

Such a memorandum of understanding would allow the town to change the road, like adding curb extensions (also known as bulb-outs) near crosswalks or installing speed bumps.

The road would remain a part of the national highway system, said Meves, and would have to accommodate truck traffic.

Audience members joked they could commission three-dimensional pavement paintings: one to mimic a giant hole and another on the Route 9 bridge over the Deerfield River depicting open water.

Other, more serious suggestions included assigning a police officer to direct traffic during heavy travel times, better calibration of the traffic lights, and more visible pavement paint colors for crosswalks and parking spaces.

Campany said he felt pleased at the audience’s willingness to experiment with managing the movement of vehicles and pedestrians in the village.

He said that fixing the basic issues of pedestrian safety in the long run would improve everyone’s lives. Most of the fixes were also under the town’s control.

Like what we do? Help us keep doing it!

We rely on the donations and financial support of our readers to help make The Commons available to all. Please join us today.

What do you think? Leave us a comment

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.


We are currently reconfiguring our comments software. Please check back if you’d like to read or leave comments on this story. —The editors

Originally published in The Commons issue #180 (Wednesday, November 28, 2012).

Share this story


Related stories

More by Olga Peters