$(document).ready(function() { $(window).scroll(function() { if ($('body').height() <= ($(window).height() + $(window).scrollTop()+500)) { $('#upnext').css('display','block'); }else { $('#upnext').css('display','none'); } }); });
Not-for-Profit, Award-Winning Community News and Views for Windham County, Vermont • Since 2006
Voices / Letters from readers

VY is a tool for us to use, and we'll need it

As a member of and communications director for the Vermont Energy Partnership, I have been vocal in my support for the continuation for Vermont Yankee. Regarding the negative impact of Vermont Yankee closure: what Gary Sachs [“As Vermont moves to green power, VY won’t be missed,” Letters, May 8] dismisses as PR spin, I regard as prudent energy planning.

VY provides something no other single, in-state power generator supplies: a large quantity of market-cost, low-carbon electricity.

As Vermont progresses toward 90-percent renewables, we will need more electricity, not less, because the oil furnaces and gasoline cars will need to be replaced with low-carbon, electrified options (geothermal heat pumps, electric cars, etc.).

Renewables developer David Blittersdorf wrote in Green Energy Times last month that Vermont will need three times as much electricity in 2050 as we consume now. Furthermore, it is highly likely that carbon-based energy will be taxed, at the federal or state levels or both.

For these reasons, and many others, it is not in Vermont’s economic or environmental interest to say “no” to a large, in-state generator of reliable, low-carbon, market-rate power.

For reasons of technology, cost, and grassroots politics, it is highly uncertain if the in-state solar/wind/hydro Mr. Sachs envisions will provide the lion’s share of our growing electricity needs.

VY is a tool to be picked up and used, not discarded when it is needed the most.

Guy Page

Like what we do? Help us keep doing it!

We rely on the donations and financial support of our readers to help make The Commons available to all. Please join us today.

What do you think? Leave us a comment

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.

Comments

We are currently reconfiguring our comments software. Please check back if you’d like to read or leave comments on this story. —The editors

Originally published in The Commons issue #203 (Wednesday, May 15, 2013).

Share this story

Links

Related stories

More by Guy Page