$(document).ready(function() { $(window).scroll(function() { if ($('body').height() <= ($(window).height() + $(window).scrollTop()+500)) { $('#upnext').css('display','block'); }else { $('#upnext').css('display','none'); } }); });
Not-for-Profit, Award-Winning Community News and Views for Windham County, Vermont • Since 2006
Town and Village

Learning Collaborative appeals tax status to state high court

DUMMERSTON—The Southeast Vermont Learning Collaborative has appealed to the Vermont Supreme Court to settle whether it’s entitled to tax exempt status, as has been denied here.

Town Attorney Robert Fisher, of Fisher & Fisher, presented the Dummerston Selectboard with his reading of the facts of the case at their meeting June 12.

Town voters in 2010 approved selling the former state library building, at 471 Route 5, to the nonprofit Learning Collaborative with the understanding that the organization would pay the full taxes of the appraised value of this property – $456,000, with an approximate yearly tax bill of $7,000.

Speaking to The Commons for a previous article, Selectboard Chair Ezekiel “Zeke” Goodband said the Collaborative “did not stand up and correct this impression.”

Indeed, Goodband said, the Collaborative’s request for tax-exempt status came as a surprise.

The Learning Collaborative provides professional development classes to teachers.

The Lister’s Office and Board of Civil Authority each have denied the organization’s request.

The Selectboard approved authorizing Fisher to submit a letter of facts in collaboration with the Learning Collaborative’s attorney to the Vermont Supreme Court on June 12.

Submitting the list of facts and allowing a judge to decide the case would be the fastest route to resolving the matter, Goodband said.

According to Selectboard Vice Chairman Lewis White, the Learning Collaborative has said that even if the judge rules in its favor, the organization will still give its original gift in lieu of taxes – a little over $3,000.

According to Fisher’s letter, read into the meeting, “The amount of the donations would represent 30 percent of the town-assessed tax valuation.”

In White’s view, should the court rule the organization is liable for taxes, then it would have to pay taxes to the town. If the court decides the Learning Collaborative is tax-exempt, then it would give the town a payment in lieu of taxes.

Should the organization and town settle the case, then the issue still would have to face state review, White said.

Like what we do? Help us keep doing it!

We rely on the donations and financial support of our readers to help make The Commons available to all. Please join us today.

What do you think? Leave us a comment

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.


We are currently reconfiguring our comments software. Please check back if you’d like to read or leave comments on this story. —The editors

Originally published in The Commons issue #208 (Wednesday, June 19, 2013).

Share this story


Related stories

More by Olga Peters