$(document).ready(function() { $(window).scroll(function() { if ($('body').height() <= ($(window).height() + $(window).scrollTop()+500)) { $('#upnext').css('display','block'); }else { $('#upnext').css('display','none'); } }); });
Not-for-Profit, Award-Winning Community News and Views for Windham County, Vermont • Since 2006
Voices / Letters from readers

No purpose served in misquotes, trustee says

The writer serves on the board of trustees of the Rockingham Free Public Library.

RE: “A challenge for good people to comply with open-meeting laws” [Viewpoint, Feb. 19]:

Regarding this letter to the community from Jan Mitchell-Love, in which I am frequently mentioned, there are several points I could rebut, including the instances in which Mitchell-Love accuses me of lying, but I will limit my reaction to these two points for the record:

1. I never said I knew I was “breaking Open Meeting Law.” What I said in an email to the trustees of the Rockingham Free Public Library on Dec. 16, 2013 was, “I know I’m breaking the rules here but I do think it is useful and important to read the attached documents prior to our meeting.” I was referring to our agreement not to send fellow trustees long documents by email. This is not the first time I have been falsely quoted.

2. On the issue of my not attending the presentation on Open Meeting Law by Secretary of State Jim Condos, Mitchell-Love would be well-advised to know the reason for my (or anyone’s) absence before assuming that I simply didn’t care enough to show up — a charge she levels against no other trustee, even though only two of nine attended that meeting.

Just as she must have good reasons for not appearing at such library events as the holiday party and a recent educational program, both sponsored by the Friends of the Library, I, too, had a good reason to be absent that night, which is why my husband attended in order to learn what Condos said.

No purpose is served by misquotes and ungrounded assumptions being included in official documents that attempt to ensnare or malign trustees with whom one doesn’t agree.

I hope it will not happen again, to any trustee.

Elayne Clift
Saxtons River

Like what we do? Help us keep doing it!

We rely on the donations and financial support of our readers to help make The Commons available to all. Please join us today.

What do you think? Leave us a comment

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.

Comments

We are currently reconfiguring our comments software. Please check back if you’d like to read or leave comments on this story. —The editors

Originally published in The Commons issue #243 (Wednesday, February 26, 2014). This story appeared on page D2.

Share this story

Links

Related stories

More by Elayne Clift