ATHENS-Vermont Friends of Israel supports the House Ethics Panel’s decision to dismiss the complaints against Reps. Sarah Austin, Matt Birong, Gina Galfetti, Will Greer, and James Gregoire arising from their trip to Israel last summer.
The committee was right to do so, and public officials should be allowed to participate in legitimate educational travel without being cast as scandalous.
Lawmakers were dragged through the mud for choosing to see Israel firsthand rather than through the distorted lens of an antizionist mob. The resulting ethics review process wasted legislators’ time and taxpayer dollars, only to conclude there were “no reasonable grounds to believe an ethical violation occurred.”
The entire episode exposed how consumed by hate local extremists have become, and how their protests against the Jewish state fuel antisemitism in Vermont.
Fact-finding trips are a way to better understand a complicated region, its security concerns, and the foreign policy realities that affect both the United States and her allies. Critics treat any engagement with Israel as inherently corrupt or immoral. That is not a serious standard. Lawmakers routinely meet with governments, advocacy groups, and institutions whose policies are debated or controversial.
The relevant question is whether any rules were violated. The committee found there were not.
Reasonable people can disagree on policy, war powers, or the conduct of foreign governments. But disagreement is not an ethics violation, and political anger is not proof of corruption.
The Vermont House Ethics Committee made the correct call.
Vermont Friends of Israel
Athens
Mark Treinkman, president and founder
This letter to the editor was submitted to The Commons.
This piece, published in print in the Voices section or as a column in the news sections, represents the opinion of the writer. In the newspaper and on this website, we strive to ensure that opinions are based on fair expression of established fact. In the spirit of transparency and accountability, The Commons is reviewing and developing more precise policies about editing of opinions and our role and our responsibility and standards in fact-checking our own work and the contributions to the newspaper. In the meantime, we heartily encourage civil and productive responses at [email protected].