Election was a referendum on rejecting misplaced drug-enforcement priorities

BRATTLEBORO — Throughout this election season, GOP challenger Randy Brock criticized Governor Peter Shumlin for supporting a reform of Vermont's outdated marijuana laws. Vermonters listened but weren't impressed with Brock's “reefer madness” propaganda, choosing instead to re-elect the popular governor.

Did Brock really believe that opposing a sensible marijuana policy reform would help him win votes? If so, he should have looked at a few polls before forming his campaign strategy.

A poll conducted in February by Public Policy Polling found that only 15 percent of Vermont voters believe the federal government's claim that alcohol is safer than marijuana.

By contrast, 75 percent believe marijuana is as safe or safer than alcohol, and voters support reducing possession penalties by a more than two-to-one margin.

Considering that it is widely known by many police officers and the public that marijuana does not cause the harm that alcohol does, there would be no rationale to continue spending limited law-enforcement resources on small-time marijuana offenses.

As a former member of the House Corrections Committee, I found that the money being spent on marijuana prosecutions could have been better used for protecting our communities from dangerous crime.

Governor Shumlin's victory shows Vermont is ready to decriminalize marijuana. He should be commended for supporting doing so responsibly, and the House and Senate should work with the governor to pass this important legislation in 2013.

Subscribe to the newsletter for weekly updates